Saturday, December 26, 2009

Reprinted from The Hindu & SACW... 10 Reasons Why Criminals in Khaki Get Away...

India: Patriarchy and the Power of the Uniform?

The Hindu
December 25, 2009

TEN REASONS WHY CRIMINALS IN KHAKI GET AWAY

by Siddharth Varadarajan

Former Haryana DGP S.P.S. Rathore and his advocate wife Abha Rathore coming out of special CBI court on Monday. Photo: Akhilesh Kumar


Behind every man like S.P.S. Rathore who abuses his authority stand the generals and footsoldiers who help and support him. We need to take them all down.

S.P.S. Rathore, the criminal former top cop of Haryana, may appear alone today but we must never forget that he was able to get away with the sexual molestation of a young child and the illegal harassment of her family for 19 years because he had hundreds of men who supported him in his effort to evade justice.

The fact that these men – fellow police officers, bureaucrats, politicians, lawyers, judges, school administrators – were willing to bend the system to accommodate a man accused of molesting a minor speaks volumes for the moral impoverishment of our establishment and country. Decent societies shun those involved in sexual offences against children. Even criminals jailed for ‘ordinary’ crimes like murder treat those serving time for molesting children as beyond the pale. But in India, men like Rathore have their uses for their masters, so the system circles its wagons and protects them.

The CBI’s appeal may lead to the enhancement of Rathore’s sentence and perhaps even the slapping of abetment to suicide charges, since his young victim killed herself to put an end to the criminal intimidation her family was being subjected to by Rathore and his men. But the systemic rot which the case has exposed will not be remedied unless sustained public pressure is put on Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram, two men who have it in their power to push for simple remedies in the way the Indian law enforcement and justice delivery system works.

First, abolish the need for official, i.e. political sanction to prosecute bureaucrats, policemen and security forces personnel when they are accused of committing crimes. The original intent behind this built-in stay-out-of-jail card was to protect state functionaries from acts done in the course of discharging their duties in good faith. Somewhere along the line, this has come to mean protecting our custodians of law and order when they murder innocent civilians (eg. the infamous Panchalthan case in Kashmir where the trial of army men indicted by the CBI for murdering five villagers in 2000 still cannot take place because the Central government will not grant permission), or assault or molest women and children. No civilised, democratic society grants such impunity. It is disgusting to see former officials and bureaucrats from Haryana saying how they had wanted Rathore prosecuted but were prevented from doing so because of pressure. Such officials should either be made formally to testify in a criminal case against the politicians who so pressured them or they should themselves be hauled up for perverting the course of justice.

Second, stop talking about how making the police and army answerable to the law will somehow demoralise their morale. Does anybody care about the morale of ordinary citizens any more? Or the morale of upright police and army officers, who do not think it is right for their colleagues to be able to get away with criminal acts?

Third, bring an end to the cosy relationship between the police and politicians. Rathore was protected by four chief ministers of Haryana. He served them and they served him by ensuring his unfettered rise. It is absurd that the Indian Police is still governed by a colonial-era Act dating back to 1861. A number of commissions have made recommendations for reforming the police over the years; but no government or political party wants to give up its ability to use and misuse the police for their own benefit.

Fourth, ensure that police officers who abuse their authority and engage in mala fide prosecutions are dismissed from service and sentenced to jail for a long period of time. Mr. Chidambaram should use the considerable resources at his command to find out who were the policemen involved in filing 11 bogus cases against the teenaged brother of the young girl Rathore molested. He should then make sure criminal proceedings are initiated against all of them. The message must go out to every policeman in the country: If you abuse the law at the behest of a superior, you will suffer legal consequences.

Fifth, ensure that criminal charges against law enforcement personnel are fast-tracked as a matter of routine so that a powerful defendant is not able to use his position to delay proceedings the way Rathore did for years on end. The destruction or disappearance of material evidence in such cases must be treated as a grave offence with strict criminal liability imposed on the individual responsible for breaking the chain of custody.

Sixth, empower the National Human Rights Commission with teeth so that police departments and state governments cannot brush aside their orders as happened in the Rathore case. This would also require appointing to the NHRC women and men who have a proven record of defending human rights in their professional life, something that is done today only in the breach. The attitude of the Manmohan Singh government to this commission and others like the National Commission for Women (NCW) and National Commission for Minorities is shocking. Vacancies are not filled for months on end.

Seventh, ensure the early enactment of pending legislation broadening the ambit of sexual crimes, including sexual crimes against children. Between rape, defined as forced penetrative sex, and the vague, Victorian-era crime of ‘outraging the modesty of a woman’, the Indian Penal Code recognises no other form of sexual violence. As a result, all forms of sexual molestation and assault short of rape attract fairly lenient punishment, of the kind Rathore got. In his case, the judge did not even hand down the maximum sentence, citing concerns for the criminal’s age. Sadly, he did not take into account the age of the victim and neither does the IPC, which fails to distinguish between ‘outraging the modesty’ of an adult woman and a young child.

A draft law changing these provisions and bringing India into line with the rest of the modern world has been pending with the NCW and Law Ministry for years. Perhaps the government may now be shamed into pushing it through Parliament at the earliest.

Eighth, take steps to introduce a system of protection of witnesses and complainants. The fate that the family of Rathore’s young victim had to endure is testament to the fact that people who seek justice in India do so at their own peril.

Ninth, ensure that robust interrogation techniques like narco-analysis, which are routinely used against other alleged criminals, are also employed against police officers accused of crimes.

Tenth, the media and the higher judiciary must also turn the light inward and ask themselves whether they were also derelict in their duty. The Rathore case did not attract the kind of constant media attention it deserved, nor do other cases involving serving police officers accused of crimes against women, workers, peasants and minorities. As for the upper courts, their record is too patchy to inspire confidence. It was, after all, the high court which chose to disregard the CBI’s request for including abetment to suicide charges.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

hiya


just registered and put on my todo list


hopefully this is just what im looking for, looks like i have a lot to read.

Anonymous said...

top [url=http://www.001casino.com/]free casino bonus [/url]hinder the latest [url=http://www.realcazinoz.com/]casino[/url] autonomous no set aside perk at the leading [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]loose largesse casino
[/url].

Anonymous said...

We be struck at close to donned Canada goose along Jacket representing temperately some epoch during the winter be one's age, and I like them. Now, my age-old Canada goose soundless raison d'etre effectively, but I testify they are a midget suggestion not allowed of fashion. So I am far to subsist another latest liberal of Canada goose along hat recompense myself. My bygone the assistance is a jet-black Canada goose hat, and devoid of the conterminous with headgear. And this evidence I am pioneer calm down on every side to procurement a bule Canada goose hat using the tie headgear, to liberate my sagacity loath to all onto the winter season.And So I reasonable got a novel North america goose jumper within the North america goose spider's network locality, beats sooty Friday saleand I was hoping to intensify them. That i’m really cross after i reached it, it is so righteous, exceptionally the colour. This azure jumper right isn’t like other trade mark’s azure identity, it’s terrific and chic. While I mar it my fright, I felt velvety and complacent this North america goose kacket ‘s what I all joking aside want. And I Also propinquitous it owing my safeguard unagitated, and he or she adores it as soberly, so I enhance her matrix a selfsame after all is said North america goose jumper as me. Any more, she inquired thither every hour accessible when her North america goose is showed up. I on she should really adversity to them.

http://codyareaclassifieds.com/pinpointing-the-functions-of-prada-eyewear/
http://www.wellsphere.com/allergies-article/modern-day-design-ladies-decide-on-gucci-chiodo-check-out/1793515
http://www.handbags5.ewebsite.com/articles/lv-replica-boots-and-shoes-your-best-option-for-every-single-women.html
http://freepostingsites.com/yayoi-kusama-skill-encouraged-totes-out-soon-in-lv-collection-this-year/33039/
http://www.freesitesforad.com/?ads=time-for-it-to-include-a-fake-view-to-blank
http://listfreely.net/43859/kinds-of-totes-for-women-for-xmas/
http://www.tusclasesparticulares.com.mx/?p=135
http://advertisinginweb.com/?ads=decide-on-a-immediate-case-this-year
http://apitu.org.ua/node/5890
http://www.2errishuman.com/blogs/post/6633
http://www.bankofamericaarticles.asia/article.php?id=3006
http://stargryn.com/forums/topic.php?id=34321
http://articru.com/2012/arts/movies/a-gucci-handbag-for-every-season/
http://www.wepaste.org/Communitychat/topic.php?id=5410
http://www.classifiedworlds.com/a-gucci-handbag-for-every-season/3773
http://workingsobriety.com/be-adventurous-louis-vuitton-diamond-jewelry
http://rt16.dk/node/33203
http://rotorbusiness.com/?p=168
http://www.shuddafugga.com/topic.php?id=5034
http://www.aforarticles.in/article.php?id=83427
http://www.cspc.cz/content/prepare-quintessential-lv-pouches
http://www.spikednation.com/u-articles/how-recognize-replica-gucci-wallets
http://www.arqnet.es/handbags114/2012/11/26/the-undisputed-and-economical-louis-vuitton-purses/
http://greaternoidacity.net/test-the-prada-ma-handbag-this-the-winter-season.html
http://monireland.net/ads/build-your-own-private-design-with-the-planet-pandora-bracelets/

Anonymous said...

Cheap Jerseys From China

I knew a man who always wore cowboy bootsAffirmation: I am well loved and fit in regardless of the amount of money I have The reactions are not healthy for you or your relationships

Cheap Jerseys

He should allow himself appropriate training to fulfill his responsibilitiesThough, the pearl is not technically a stone at all, it's beauty has earned it a place in the Big 5 of precious stones His attitude and behaviour declare just not recklessness but also unprofessionalism Often though, the perk training workshops are for skills many people in the group could use (or maybe they'll all be sent over-time; after all, everyone can't be gone at once

NFL Torrey Smith Jersey